![]() ![]() You also have a whole host of labeling options. You can change the size and shape of the thumbnails. Go to the View drop-down menu and select View > Thumbnail View Options. You can choose to declutter the workspace, showing only the elements you need. You change the user interface to see the features you want to see. Thumbnail Viewsįor a start, you have more thumbnail view options. But speak directly to the needs of photographers. The changes in the Browse workspace seem small. The workspace looks the same as in 2021, but there are a few minor but useful improvements in the 2022 version. The rating systems are like those in Lightroom, with colors, ratings, and likes. But it easily handles the major file types. As the name implies, Photo Raw works with RAW image files. ![]() The Browse workspace lets you edit metadata and cull through your images. ON1 Photo RAW has a fully conceptualized DAM (digital asset management) system. Browse Workspace: Digital Asset Management (DAM) Let’s look at some of the improvements in the latest version. Now, with the 2022.5 version, the decision just got more difficult. See our review to find out how ON1 did in a head-to-head comparison. And it has all the best bits of Photoshop. It lets you adjust facial features like the Liquify workspace in Photoshop.įor photographers, ON1 Photo Raw is more than Adobe Lightroom. You can even edit facial features to make a more pleasing portrait. Or use layers and blending modes to add textures. With a few clicks, you can add sun flares or bokeh effects. This editing program includes pixel-changing options only found in Adobe Photoshop. Panels group frequent edits, and sliders tweak individual adjustments.īut Photo RAW is not just a Lightroom imitator. The editing workspace is easy to navigate. The labeling options let you find your favorite photos in a flash. You can add and adjust keywords and metadata. It has a full digital asset management system (DAM) to help you organize images. ON1 Photo RAW is a photo editing program comparable to Adobe Lightroom. A 20 - 30% price drop might make it more interesting - maybe, not sure.What is ON1 Photo Raw 2022 Photo Editing Software? I don't think I would buy ON1 at least not at the current price, and maybe, only if I printed more often. But then again, I don't print often enough to make that a key decision point. I would have to use it to print from or from Affinity Photo, which isn't a whole lot better. You can do fine printing from within ACDSee, but its printing module is a little old fashioned, and frankly a little clunky to use. Nothing is the cheapest option, but the least satisfying. To do resizing for other purposes, is buried within a very obtuse UI that I still haven't gotten used to after a frustrating week of use. It sort of assumes that the user will want to print an enlargement, so the easiest way to use it is to pick the print size, and the paper presets you will use and let it do the rest, you can also print directly from it. There is something to that, but that Gigapixel AI image sure is good looking. ![]() ![]() Yeah, there were some artifacts at extreme pixel peeping magnification, but not many, and nothing that would preclude use for anything other than proving you're a purer, more demanding, photographer than the next person.ĪCDSee and On1 didn't have any artifacts since it seems they attempt to only recreate the level of sharpness built into the original. Gigapixel AI would be next since it tries to merge a traditional options format into a clean modern user interface that incorporates an AI base. It is what I know and what I am comfortable with. Everything else is handled elsewhere within ACDSee. That may be because it's a simple resize utility with how much to enlarge, what algorythm to use and what grades of sharpness. However, I would rate ACDSee tops for ease of use. Topaz was an obvious winner in terms of IQ, and I think, more amenable to uses other than printing In terms of absolute image quality on this photo, I would personally rate themĪCDSee and ON1 were very close in IQ, I wouldn't argue if others reversed the order on those two. But I think for adding room to crop, Gigapixel AI would probably be better. I suspect all 3 would do well with printing a simple 2X enlargement. I can do better, depending on what I what to do with the enlargement. I am unlikely to enlarge my files beyond 2X, so that is what I tested with. I've been using the proprietary "ClearIQZ" model so far built into ACDSee, and I wanted to see if I could do better. As an otherwise happy m43s shooter, I'm thinking it might be useful at times. I've been thinking about getting an enlargement utility lately. A "SORTA" stream of consciousness test & review, where I prove my ability to make no decisions whatsoever! ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |